Alex and Daniel
We checked a Noliac NAC2125-H08 for shorts and found none. We measured the capacitance to be 2.4641 uF. The expected capacitance is 2.4 uF. We also measured a resistance of 3.5082 kOhm. When we pressed on the piezo, we noticed a voltage. We flagged one of the wires for polairty. See attached photos. We also noticed that the nylon tipped set screws that hold the piezo in place provide a voltage.
I looked for the dots on the Piezo we tested, and they are on the wire we DID NOT FLAG. I think we should flip which wire is flagged and then use that convention going forward.
I flagged the lead of the piezo with the black dot, which is explicitly stated by Noliac as the positive electrode. When I press on the piezo, there is a positive voltage when measuring off this positive lead.
Boris has succesfully mounted in the SNSPD that we have been wokring on putting together. The SNSPD is in the ICE cryo chamber in Downs 123, and we will soon begin our testing of the PCR curves and dark count rate tests. See images for a close up view of the mounted SNSPD.
I have now succesfully done some first tests on the 75V regulator circuit, first piece of the 5V reference circuit, and the Bias voltage circuit (5V reg >> 70, 65, 60, 50 volts). I have been experiencing some issues getting the +-5V clean references to work as well as the +-15V linear regulators, but this should all be fixed in the coming week! See the attatched images for the bias voltage outputs (check out my 3 power supplies haha).
I should be able to soon test the APD next week then begin developing the first PCB for the APD.
I used to the Moku:Pro laser lockbox to maintain the small Michelson IFO in B102 at an ajustable point on the fringe. The Moku input is a photodiode signal at the output, and the Moku output goes to the piezo controller's external input, which in turn drives a ring piezo on one of the end mirrors.
On the attached photos you see the Moku setup, photodiode signal (red), error signal (blue), and scanning signal (green) used to acquire the lock. The second photo shows the system in lock. I have not optimised the control loop, so it is not very robust. Next step will be to measure transfer functions for the piezo actuator.
Retook beam profile coming out of SHG with everything in place. SHG Profile data can be found at Nextcloud/GQuEST/B102/SHG/SHG\ Beam\ 20Profile/SHG_Profile.ipynb. Will use this to match to the fiber inputs at the end of the SHG farm. All 4 paths on the SHG farm should be within an inch of each other so 1 MM solution before the first 50:50 should be sufficient. Will also post a solution for the two lens on either side of the AOM.
The input couplers for fibers we have want ~500 um size beams at the input. The attached photos show an approximate solution in JAMMT, and its experimental implementation. Discrepency arises from the uncertainty of the length in the path from the PBS to the input couplers.
Then I came up with an approximate solution for the lenses before and after the AOM. The full_jammt photo shows this to scale with the space we have on the sled. I think this will work. Ready to fire up an AOM now.
I also noticed a mistake on the SHG sled that had the path lengths differing by a couple inches that has been corrected.
[Sander, Ian, and Daniel]
The three of us set up a Michelson Interferometer to test the Noliac NAC2125-H08 (Ring Piezo) with 1550 nm laser light. See attached photo. The alignment was optimized to maximize the contrast.
The piezo is rated for 200 V and the MDT693B (Thorlabs Open-Loop Piezo Controllers) is rated for 150 V, but we decided to linearly sweep the data from 0 V to 150 V over 20 s. We saw the interferometer go through 8 fringes, exactly what we expect.
Free stroke = 12.6 μm , so there is a length change of 63 nm/V. Applying 100 V gives 6300 nm. A fringe is every 775 nm (the path length changes 2x the piezo change). Fringes = length change / (length/fringe) = 8.1 fringes, pretty much exactly what we observe. See attached graph and data.
[Torrey, Sander]
As described in entry 11348, the SHG was found to be producing much less 775 nm light than the SHG spec sheet predicts. We put a half-waveplate in front of the input fibre coupler upstream of the SHG to test the polarisation dependence of the SHG's output power. We found a strong dependence; we optimised the waveplace orientation and found SHG output powers at or slightly above spec.
We tried to rotate the fibre in the collimator mount to try to send the optimal polarisation to the SHG, but this optimisation process was very laborious and not very succesful (as the fibre collimator mounting is quite finicky), so we decided to leave the half-waveplate in place.
I put one Newport Dielectric Mirror, Laser Line, 25.4 mm, λ/10, 1520-1580 nm (10D20DM.8) each in the crusher and piezo bowtie subassemblies. The piezo subassembly also has a Clean Room Viton Fluoroelastomer O-Rings, Chemical-Resistant, 1/16 Fractional Width, Dash Number 020, 1309N22, from McMaster. After compressing the piezo and the o-ring by threading in the SM1 ring, I backed off the screws that hold the piezo.
The subassemblies themselves are mounted to test. I set up a Michelson Interferometer to test the piezo. The piezo leads are connected to a BNC, with the positive lead in the center of the BNC and the negative lead to ground. A Thorlabs MDT693B - 3-Channel, Open-Loop Piezo Controller is also ready to be used. The output port of the Michelson is a 1550 nm photodiode.
The crusher is mounted on a bowtie cavity and the beam profiler is ready to be used there.
Right now, I am waititng on a Thorlabs order I placed today to get fiber outputs mounted into SM1 rings.
I have dissasembled the axetris - EMIRS50 AT06V BR25M thermal source such that the reflective can was desoldered. Next, to properly mount the thermal source into the previously described lens tube assembly (11334) the thermal source was soldered onto a brass washer using thermal paste and the PCB oven. The end results are shown bellow in attachments 1-3. The parts for the assembly will be here on monday to be machined and assembled.
The source was placed as closely to the center of the washer as possible, but a custom washer may need to be designed such that minimum alignment is needed when assembling the fiber coulped device.
The SNSPD will undergo a PCR test and be placed in the fridge monday as well.
While cleaning the Newport AJS254-0.5K-NL Adjustment Screw, I sonicated three Newport AJS254-0.5K-NL Adjustment Screws in isopropyl alcohol at 30°C for 20 minutes. When I came back, I discovered the tip had dissolved. I thought the tip was stainless steal like the body, but it might not be. I reached out to Newport for clarification. If the crusher does work (we at least one screw on hand), we will need 3 more replacements.
[Daniel Torrey]
One of the low power paths in the power distribution center (See "C:\Users\gques\Nextcloud\GQuEST\Layout_Mockups\B102_starting_setup_pwr_dist.svg" for updated layout) is aligned with 84% efficiency through the fiber. We have light available for readout filter cavity science.
[Daniel Torrey]
Profiled the output of the SHG, data for which can be found at Nextcloud/GQuEST/B102/SHG/SHG Beam Profile/ .See attached. Note the output for the SHG fiber has a collimator, very easy to change the beam profile.
Note that this profile is outdated, I adjusted the output collimator so that the beam would fit through the small aperture of the EOM. Updated profile should be in the next cloud B102 directory.
Set current to 2.3 amps. This corresponds to 3.96 W out of the amplifier. The beam goes through a PBS, 50:50, 90:10, and PBS. The waveplates before the PBS can be optimized to give <1% loss in the S pol. Assuming minimal loss at the 50:50 and 90:10 this gives 1.75 W into the fiber. With 85% efficiency through the fiber my best guess is we have ~1.48W going into the SHG. The readout on the power meter shows 38 mW. This can be adjusted by the ratios in responsivities of the power meter at 775 and 830 so 38mW * 207.1/146.77 = 54 mW of 775 nm light. If we believe the covesion data sheet it predicts ~350 mW for similiar inputs. Could our SHG be that much more inefficient? Based on the power we ARE getting out of the SHG, according to the data sheet, you would think were feeding in approximately 500 mW, which I don't think is the case. Don't want to stick the power meter in there though.
2.3 A on the amplifier was the previously calculated acceptable operating point to not damage the faraday isolator at the amplifier output. I'm assuming 50 mW of 775 nm light is not sufficient for all of gquest, although I don't have a good sense for this number.
Lee suggested to check we are at the correct temperature. According to this test the peak temp is 50.423 C, whereas the manual suggests 50.461. There is a slight uncertainty since we don't have a way to perfectly sync the time scales of the moku and temperature controller logger. Even still though the efficiency as a function of temperature is fairly flat near the peak. I don't think this explains the big discepancy in efficiency of the SHG.
https://wiki.mccullerlab.com/Main/NoliacPiezoInfo
SHG and temperature controller turned on and we are seeing 775 nm light (probably). Couple of things:
1) The thorlabs power meter doesn't have a 775 nm light calibration, if we want to detect 775 we may want to find another power meter. The closest it has is 830 nm.
2) SHG temp controller takes ~350 seconds to stablize to within .005 of a degree. Set it to 50.461 C for maximum 775 effeciency.
3)The SHG cavity it wildly inefficient at low input powers, it produces 38.5 uW of 775 with an input of 28 mW (.13% effeciency, also for the record 4 uW measured at 1550 as well). I ramped the current on the amplifier to 1A. This corresponds to an input power of 93 mW which yields an output of 150uW (.16% effeciency). The SHG has been assigned the serial number S2300012, see that link for specs and manual for this which has an efficiency curve as a function of input power. Similarly for the temperature controller S2300013.
We also need a more permanent way to mount it to a breadboard if anyone wants to 3D print something for it.
Daniel, Torrey, and Sander
To measure the power out of the SHG, we are using a Thorlabs S132C without the ND filter on. We measured the output of the SHG before and after reflection at a 45° AOI off a Thorlabs BB1-E03 mirror. The BB1-EO3 reflects p-polarized 775 nm light at 99.2 and 1550 nm light at 7.0%. There was no noticible change in the power before and after reflection, indicating very little 1550 nm was transmitted out of the SHG. To measure the 775 nm power from the SHG, we set the S132C to 700 nm and 830 nm. Using the given responsivity (mA/W) specs as a function of wavelength, we can convert the given power at these selected wavelenghts to 775 nm power. For a setting of 830 nm, multiply the given power by 1.41 to get the 775 nm power. For a setting of 700nm, multiply the given power by 0.54 to get the 775 nm power. Doing this gives 1.59 mW and 1.61 mW, respectivly, for infered 775 nm power. We were expecting around 5 mW for a 200 mW input based on the SHG specs, but the graph is difficult to read. Further analysis is needed.
[Torrey Daniel]
Began initial set up of the power distribution center. We have all the parts according to the diagram. Things are roughly aligned up until the first 50:50 BS. Will do alignment into input fiber couplers tomorrow. Torrey will attach photos and diagrams in a comment on this post.
We also put all of the laser initialization on one breadboard. This includes the seeder, polarization paddles, fiber PBS, and amplifier. The amplifier output is mounted on the power distribution center.
Update to power distrubtion center. We have things roughly aligned. The four large 1/4-20s at the end of each path represent an equal distance from the first 50:50 BS. We need more fiber collimators/input couplers however. There are 3 of these which seem less than ideal for input alignment as they have no way to control the z-axis. I suggest we get more of Lee's prefered collimator. At least three but more would be better for the future. Also going to buy better ways to mount the F230APC-1550's.
The beam splitters were mounted a 1/4 inch too high. Remounted and did course alignment. We also have a proper way to mount the fiber input couplers (they were slipping). Replaced those and put them in their approximate location. We need to make a proper mode matching solution. I don't know the exact beam size these collimators want though.
RE: need a proper MM solution for this path.
I double checked what the collimator beam looks like coming out from old data, the spec sheet quotes 530 um, our measured data was ~460 um. A 1 m focal length lens roughly 1 meter away from the collimator inputs provides a 94% match. Keeping it like this. Attached the jam file and a picture in case you don't have jammt.